Nika Mühl was everywhere vs. Villanova
— UConn Women’s Basketball (@UConnWBB) February 1, 2024
- 12 points
- 10 assists
- 5 rebounds
- 2 steals pic.twitter.com/fwFqaIWVbj
Allie Ziebell Full Game
24 points (10-21 FG, 2-8 3-PT, 2-3 FT), 13 rebs, 4 steals
*************************************************
Some time ago, I proposed an alternative way to rank teams. Here is another one. Your task to figure out how these teams are ranked.
This time should be easier because I’m going to provide some hints.
• As before, this is a derivative ranking and requires access to some ranking system. The first list uses Massey
• While the prior example was motivated by the criteria used by the selection committee, that’s even more true of this one
• the metric doesn’t quite work for South Carolina but I don’t think anyone will quibble with my arbitrary placement
Frankly, my initial guess was that UConn would be a little higher on this list but 5th is pretty darn good. It’s not quite as high as their NET (3), or their Massey ranking (4), but it’s well above their AP ranking. I see this as good news as the selection committee doesn’t officially consider AP ranking but they will consider this metric.
1. South Carolina
2. Kansas State
3. Indiana
4. Iowa
5. UConn
6. Colorado
7. Stanford
8. Oregon State
9. Gonzaga
10. UCLA
11. Notre Dame
12. Texas
13. Virginia Tech
14. NC State
15. Ohio State
16. Louisville
17. Baylor
18. Utah
19. USC
20. LSU
21. Texas A&M
22. Washington State
23. TCU
24. Marquette
25. Auburn
For anyone I’m interested in looking at Massey rankings. I also did the same exercise with AP rankings.
1. South Carolina
2. Kansas State
3. Indiana
4. Iowa
5. UConn
6. Oregon State
7. Colorado
8. Stanford
9. Notre Dame
10. Gonzaga
11. UCLA
12. Texas
13. Virginia Tech
14. USC
15. NC State
16. Ohio State
17. Louisville
18. Baylor
19. Utah
20. LSU
21. Texas A&M
22. Washington State
23. TCU
24. Marquette
25. Auburn
If you haven’t memorized the selection criteria, shame on you (just kidding), here they are:
Criteria used by the Division I Women’s Basketball Committee to evaluate a team includes (alphabetically):
• Bad losses
• Common opponents
• Competitive in losses
• Conference record
• Early performance versus late performance
• Head-to-head
• NET ranking
• Non-conference record
• Observable component
• Overall record
• Regional rankings
• Significant wins
• Strength of schedule
UConn 98 Villanova 42. Olsen 4.
Nika 23/39, Aaliyah 22/34, Paige 20/39, KK 12/29, Ice 5/14, Ashlynn 5/36, Amari 2/1, Qadence 2/7, Ines 1/1. All positive.
Late had to watch men’s game. UConn: must see tv!