Season-high 32 points for Paige Bueckers‼️
— UConn Women’s Basketball (@UConnWBB) January 18, 2024
And of course it comes with a steal pic.twitter.com/GCiqaOkBgE
Paige Bueckers is up to 3⃣0⃣ points! pic.twitter.com/qGAHAQ4uyj
— UConn Women’s Basketball (@UConnWBB) January 18, 2024
Injuries have forced TCU WBB to cancel its games this week against Kansas State and Iowa State; the games won't be made up and will count as forfeits per Big 12 rules affecting only the teams' Big 12 win-loss records https://t.co/fS7gw5WyTL pic.twitter.com/nIEpOQr7XD
— Raoul (@Raoul_000) January 17, 2024
'24 committ Allie Ziebell 32 points, 12 rebounds
(9-19 FG, 4-10 3-PT, 10-10 FT)
Cheli and Ziebel part of the midseason Naismith award list with 25 players left.Our @jerseymikes Naismith Girls’ High School POY 2024 Midseason Team has been announced ❗️❗️❗️
— Naismith Awards (@NaismithTrophy) January 16, 2024
Full List: https://t.co/ZAbMltg1hf pic.twitter.com/jtxUDung8I
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kaleena “Special K” Smith has been putting up numbers all season. She dropped 42 pts last night against Aquinas! @specialkayyy11 pic.twitter.com/4BTMR9Mawn
— Ballislife Womens Basketball (@ballislifewbb_) January 17, 2024
JUST A HS FRESHMAN??? WOW!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full Game. Just look for the really tall player
*************************************************
Two days ago I talked about Tennessee's chances of making the tournament, but I talked more generally about what it takes to earn an at-large invitation. I noticed a Lady Vol fan who made generally astute comment about the Tennessee results so far but suggested that beating a ranked team would be necessary to make the tournament.
My quick reaction was that the thesis was flawed, because it wasn't hard to find teams who earned at-large bids but did not have a win over a top 25 team. I'm going to revisit that thought.
However, first I'm going to remind you that yesterday I noted that 48 was an important number four Massey ranking, as teams with that ranking or better had a great chance of getting invitations and teams with a worse ranking were very unlikely to. I noted two exceptions, Illinois and St. John's, both of whom were invited to the tournament despite Massey rankings significantly weaker than 48. Each of those teams had a signature win, Illinois beating Iowa and St. John's beating UConn.
When I looked at Creme's latest bracket, one name jumped out at me – Auburn
Auburn has a Massey ranking of 59, and in NET ranking of 68, either value remotely close to the possible cut off of 48.
Creme did not pick Florida to make the tournament with a slightly better Massey ranking (58) and is significantly better NET (49). Nor did he pick Tennessee, which has a better Massey ranking in a better NET ranking than Auburn.
So why does he have Auburn in the tournament? Because they have something that neither Florida nor Tennessee have — a signature win. Florida's best win is Michigan, not a terrible team but a team not only not ranked, but not even getting votes. Tennessee's best when is Oklahoma who was ranked at the time, but who has fallen on hard times and is ranked 45 by Massey and not in the AP voting.
In contrast, Auburn beat LSU, the team arguably a little bit over ranked at number 10 in the AP but definitely in the rankings closer to the top than the bottom.
It's worth noting that both the Massey and the NET rating system reflects the win over LSU, and the ranking values are still a long way away from what one might expect for an at-large team, so essentially we are saying Creme believes (or more accurately, Cremes assessment of what the committee believes) that a win over a top 15 team is worthy of extra credit.
I haven't explored this notion with other teams, but now that grandkids are no longer underfoot, that may be worth looking at some of the teams just barely making the tournament to see if this helps explain why they are on his list.
Going back to my earlier point, while Tennessee is currently ranked 32 in Massey, they are ranked 64 in NET. Perhaps the label fan was making the arguably sensible point that the selection committee doesn't directly look at Massey but they do directly look at NET, and if the 64 ranking doesn't materially improve, the best way for Tennessee to earn an at-large invitation is to get a signature win. I haven't yet determined whether simply being in the rankings qualifies as a signature when or if it has to be something like top 15. At the moment that doesn't have to be determined. Tennessee's remaining 12 games include to against South Carolina and one against LSU. A win in any one of those three games would definitely qualify. Alabama and Texas A&M are in shouting distance of a ranking, but one of the other would have to become ranked and lose to Tennessee to determine whether beating a ranked team in the bottom grouping qualifies as a signature win. That may be a tough needle to thread, as both Alabama and Texas A&M would have to do well in the remainder of their schedule to move up into the rankings and losing to Tennessee would put a crimp in that plan.
I now wonder if that lady involved in wasn't simply saying that one has to beat a ranked team to make the tournament, but saying that Tennessee (in light of an NET 64 ranking) needed a win over a ranked team to earn an invitation. I personally think that Tennessee can get an invitation even with the losses to LSU and South Carolina but we will see soon enough.
Net positives/minutes played: We have Paige and they don’t 32/33, Oh Canada 17/37, Croatian Sensation 14/37, Special KK 13/35, Q baller 8/10, Ice is nice 4/16, Portugal 1/2, Made in the Shade 0/28, Big Enigma-1/2.
That was a pain in the neck! Can’t wait to see Paige win a national championship this year, next year and/or the year after.
No comments:
Post a Comment